- 分享到:
Task Direction
You will have 45 minutes to plan and compose a response that presents your perspective on the topic you select. A response on any other topic will receive a zero. You are free to accept, reject, or qualify the claim made in the topic you selected, as long as the ideas you present are clearly relevant to the topic. Support your views with reasons and examples drawn from such areas as your reading, experience, observations, or academic studies.
GRE readers who are college and university faculty will read your response and evaluate its overall quality, based on how well you do the followingconsider the complexities and implications of the issue organize, develop, and express your ideas on the issue support your ideas with relevant reasons and examplescontrol the elements of standard written English.
You may want to take a few minutes to think about the issue and to plan a response before you begin writing. Be sure to develop your ideas fully and organize them coherently, but leave time to reread what you have written and make any revisions that you think are necessary.
Section Direction
Present your perspective on the issue below, using relevant reasons and/or examples to support your views.
Question:
"No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
作者能较准确地使用学术词汇，不过存在个别拼写错误；作者应增加文中长句和从句和使用；上下文衔接不流畅，文章结构不严谨。
Nowadays, more and more people are concerned about the problem of cross domain communication. Some people think that no field of study can advance significantly, then furthermore, they believe outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study can obtain great progress. I can not entirely agree with this statement. I do not think that no field of study can advance significantly, and to obtain great progress through excharge knowledge and experience is base on master the knowledge and experience in this field. The reasons are as follows. First of all, I am the negative attitude toward this views that field of study can not advance significantly. Qualititive change is base on quantity had been accumulated. Remarkable advance is clearly a qualititve change. We can not because there is no see remarkable advance to deny the former accumulation of knowledge and experience. Next, we just had seen the remarkable advance through bring the knowledge and experience of other field of study, delibrately igore the failure of the technology of intrusion. We just master the technology and experience on our field of study, can deal with the technology of intrusion in other fields, also can own use. For example, biochemistry is being developed through biology by chemical method. In sum, we should take a correct attitude to face the remarkable advance in our field of study. Meanwhile, we welcome the help from the other field of study.
