英语-日语 - 地盘 - 记录 - 日志 - 下载 - 擂台赛 - 查词 - 翻译 - 排行
  • 登录
  • 注册
  • 建议

      
  • 公告
  • 常见问题
您现在的位置:首页> 留学> 雅思> 真题> 2011年4月2日雅思大作文真题:飞机旅行是否应当廉价

2011年4月2日雅思大作文真题:飞机旅行是否应当廉价

发布时间:2013-08-08 16:37浏览次数:7566
要求:

【题目要求

Many people think cheap air travel should been couraged because it gives ordinary people freedom to travel further. However, others think this leads toenvironmental problem, so air travel should be more expensive in order to discourage people from having it. Discuss both views andgive your own opinion.


【题目翻译】

很多人认为我们应当鼓励廉价的飞机旅行,因为它给了普通人远行的自由。然而,另外一些人则认为这会导致环境问题,因此飞机旅行应当更加昂贵,以便减少人们的使用。谈论双方观点更给出你自己的观点。

【关键词分析】

cheap air travel

本题不是简单的飞机旅行的利与弊,而是问飞机旅行是否应当廉价。

话题分类与题型

本题是旧题,与2008年6月14日的考题完全相同,与2010年4月10日(见下)的考题也几乎一致。属于科技类与环保类的混合话题,题型为Discursive(Argumentation)。值得一提的是,最近考老题的次数较多,上一次考试(2011年3月19日)的考题与2008年11月15日的完全相同,因此提醒各位考生一定要重视对历年考题的复习。有意思的是,今天欧洲考区的话题同样是科技类与环保类的混合题型,同样是2008年的考过的旧题。题目是科技改变农产品产量与质量的利弊(详见本文最后)。

话题评价

环保类写作话题题库中有一个小分支是关于“交通工具”的。从2003年至今,这个分支话题共出现8次,其中2次是问汽车的利弊,6次飞机是否应该被限制(其余4道话题见下)。这些话题的基本思路都是相同的,缺点主要从环保角度去考虑。当然每个话题有不同的侧重点,同学需要认真对待。

类似真题

1.   Some people think the recent increase in cheap airtravel brings benefits, while other people think it has drawbacksto the environment and the world's resources. Discuss both viewsand give your opinion. (100410)

2.   Some people believe that air travel should berestricted because it causes seriouspollutionand uses up the world’s fuel resources. To whatextent do you agree or disagree? (060218)

3.   One long-distance flight consumes fuel which a caruses in several years’ time, but theycausethe same amount of pollution. So some people thinkthat we should discouragenon-essential flights, such as tourist travel,rather than to limit the use of cars. To what extentdo you agree or disagree? (060325,080405)

【结构与思路】

本文属于Discuss both views and give youropinion题型,因此双方的观点必须都提及,缺一不可。但是结论上未必要折中,如果要支持一方的话,则选择驳斥另外一方即可。 

用户的作文(系统评分90.0分
评语:

作者词汇基本功很好,学术词汇表达也比较恰当;作者有一定功底,可在平时练习中增加长难句的记忆;文章采用了适当的过渡词和衔接词,结构比较严谨。

用户练习作文:

Basically, there are two aspects of the problems which need to be taken into account. one is the demand of cheap flight, the other should be the environmental impact. The argument which calling for price reduction is reasonable because the facts that the free flow of people would boost world economy. Traveling by air is becoming more common than before due to its speed advantage and the market driving force. Especially when global economy is slacking off, it is important to facilitate the easy access of airline services by more ordinary people. Not only can it enhance the communication of people, but also act as a new market which grows up recently as strong as auto industry in developing countries. The environmental impact is also very sensitive to anyone who concern about our surroundings. As most planes burn fossil fuel to gain power, all sorts of air pollutant from that would break down the ozone, push global warming, cause acid precipitation and so on. The European Union had released a draft to charge aircraft from abroad a carbon emission fee. The United Nations climate change conference shows that the environment effect involves sophisticated international games of both politic and economic. Whether games or demands, it seems the only way to go is developing new energy free of pollution and capable of support our world efficiently. We have to see the trade off between human and nature before that dream come true.

会员评论0个评论)
dsaewa
金币:2124

ta的空间

ta写的其它作文
更多
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ta本期其它用户练习作文
更多
得分:90.5sparkmatrix

人气:42发布:2013-09-06

得分:89.5wangqf_2006

人气:49发布:2013-11-16

得分:89.5pennyku

人气:41发布:2014-08-15

得分:89.53163332317

人气:66发布:2014-10-31

得分:89.0kaysuu

人气:35发布:2014-09-03