- 分享到:
【题目要求】
Some people think government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
【题目翻译】
大多数政府的财政应该投资于理科教育这样，而不是其他科目，这样国家才能发展和进步，是否认同?
【题目解析】
写作的步骤：
1. 改写题目—— 个性开篇
2. 主题观点—— 政府既要投资理科教育还有重视文科教育
3. 思路拓展—— 发展理科的利好+提倡文科教育的利好
4. 正文写作—— 让步反驳模版
5.仔细检查—— 词汇拼写，语法，逻辑
背景介绍的词汇替换：
1. government money = national budget 国家预算
2. should = ought to = be supposed to 应该
3. be invested in = allocate money to sth 将钱分配给
4. teaching science = focus on the education of science subjects 学习理科
5. rather than = instead of 不是……
6. any other subjects = arts n.文科
7. in order for = so that = for the purpose of 为了……的目的
8. a country = a nation = a state 一个国家
9. develop= become mighty = become powerful = become influential 发展和强大
10. progress = make great progress 取得进步
清晰概念：
理科的含义：计算机，商科，会计，数学，经济学，物理，化学
其他科目的含义：文学，历史，哲学，美术，音乐，体育
谋篇布局：
首段：背景(引入名人名言)+争议(句式引导)+目的(直接亮出观点)
培根说：知识就是力量，教育在个人成长以及国家发展中发挥了日益重要的作用。教育是生产力发展的驱动力，认识到这一点，很多国家政府高度重视人才的培养。关于政府的教育预算是应该投资理科还是其他科目，人们一直没有停止争议。我认为，理想的教育预算的分配应该是理科文科并重的。
二段：让步国家投资理科教育的利好
的确，我们很容易找到例子和理由去支持国家投资理科。第一，国家的竞争某种程度上就是人才的竞争。科技是生产力发展的驱动力，大量科技人才的培养可以为国家的发展和强大注入新鲜的活力。第二，比之文科生，具有计算机，商科，会计背景的人才可以创造更多的经济价值。
三段：提出也要学习文科的理由和意义
然而，认为国家的教育投资应该仅仅局限于理科不是其他科目，是肤浅的。国家的强大含义含义很广，人的培养也应该是以实现全面发展为目标。国家建设需要企业家，数学家，科学家，但是也不能忽视艺术家，作家，画家和音乐家的巨大作用。除了理科，文史哲，音乐美术体育，也应该成为教育的目标。文学可以增强人的文化底蕴，历史加深对于事物的洞察，哲学培养人的辩证思维，音乐陶冶人的情操，美术培养人的艺术眼光，体育提高人的健康指数。教育不应该有太强的功利目的，更应该重视人的精神成长和性格培养。所以，除了理科，文科同意有学习的价值，文科人才对于国家进步同意意义非凡。
尾段：文科理科并重才能实现教育的全面发展
我认为，教育不应该有太强的功利目的，更应该重视人的精神成长和性格培养。理性的国家教育预算应该是文科理科并重。
文章用词灵活多样，学术词汇使用也比较准确；作者句法知识很棒，适当增加从句的使用，会取得更不错的成绩；上下文衔接不流畅，文章结构不严谨。
Recently, there have been a heated debate about whether or not should the separation of art and science subject in college entrance exam continue. Actually the debate has something to do with the role of science and art. As people are calling for the canceling of the separation in order to help the student to learn in a comprehensive way. Our world is becoming more integrated than ever. That means we need to work with people from different background, to deal with some problems we can't figure out alone. So besides being acquaint with some specific expertise, a wide breadth of general knowledge is also needed. This can be reflected in professions changes throughout the past decades. Job prospect in the primary sector and secondary industry is less promising than the tertiary industry like commerce and transport and catering, which is not science related areas. So basically what we need are some all-round talents. Affected by this trend in society, interdisciplinary cooperation is emphasized in our universities. Some new courses are created. A good example is evolutionary finance, which introducing some notions form the biology science into finance study. So I think science would be boosted and better applied in society only by cooperate with other subjects. Namely, government should invest equally in all subjects.
