- 分享到:
题目要求：
Some people think all children learn history in school is important. Some others think learning subjects more relevant to life is important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
可增加从句和复杂句的使用；文章采用了适当的过渡词和衔接词，结构比较严谨；作者词汇量积累较好，但学术词汇的积累仍需加强，还要避免有拼写错误。
The history course always make us recall the time we repeatedly read the names, years, figures and events to prevent up from getting the feeling of desperation during the examination. Perhapse, because of this unpleasant experience, many of us may dispise the history. In the light of this, we usually quot the some utiliarians\\\' statement that \\\"the subjects that are revelant to everyday life is more important than history\\\", and use it as an execuse for us not to study history carefully. Actually, The reason for those utilirians is quite logical, we need to master some basic skills like writing, mathmatics, nature to let us capable of dealing the runtine work in our life. It is more benifical for children to master these skills than adults. However, A broad knowledge of history may greatly expand our life experience, enhance our insight into complicated situations, provide us wisdom on makeing difficult decisions and finally shape our view of world. The experience of history studying in our childhood may benifit us in the process of understanding the history. To sum up, I think all children should learn some history, but the method of teaching should be changed to be more insteresting. In addition, early training on subjects that is revelant to life is also important, but it should not completely occupy the children\\\'s study time.
