Directions: Present your perspective on one of the issues below, using relevant reasons and/or examples to support your views. “The function of science is to reassure; the purpose of art is to upset. Therein lies the value of each.”
作者词汇表达灵活丰富,希望学术词汇的使用能更熟练;作者在句法层面做的很棒;语言不流畅;连词使用偏少。
I tend to agree a noble perspective, science mixed with arts sometimes better enlightens brains and makes abstractions more concrete to grasp, since graphs and metaphors always serve well for knowlege, helping grouping concepts and linking each other and give life to logic. Indeed, science influences a lot in many aspects of the whole life of everyone, we enjoy material things with science, we develop our careers and establish joint groups using phones and laptops, of course we can conciously make future predictions and seek for secrets hide in the past by taking datas and analyzing them with statistical means being used. But all about those sound way too serious. and that's where arts come in. And I also disagree that arts are used to hit time, let misery slips into happiness in order to have a sort of balance or something. Arts are not created for remarks of boring people or mood wrecks as a tool to make fun which rise embarrassment and end up with nothing. So it may well realize that arts are other shapes of science. the forms science are reflected in hearts, in minds, in spirits. generally, it is natural to connect arts and science because of their similarities and they can perfectly comprehend each other using their own languages and words. a little example: a noble france novelist who favored science fiction actually provides people at that time the direction to invent machines which can free people in the universe.