- 分享到:
【题目要求】
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television, newspapers, magazines, and other media pay too much attention to the personal lives of famous people such as public figures and celebrities. Use specific reasons and details to explain your opinion.
【题目分析】
不能同意这个观点——因为这样的说法过于片面。有些..媒体(大众传媒mass media)表现得过于关注名人。但是真正的起因(the real cause)却是大众(thepublic; the broad masses of the people)本身——大众过于关注名人以及名人的私生活。媒体不过是在迎合大众(cater to the needs of customers; 过去几年里, 电视一直迎合大众的口味。 In the past several years, television has been playing to the gallery.)，因为媒体也是商业机构(commercial organization)，也要盈利(profit-driving)。不是所有....媒体都在一味迎合大众，也不是所有的television program, newspaper column都在关注名人。作者词汇基本功不错，学术词汇表达灵活熟练；能够很好的使用长难句且句法很棒；语言不流畅；连词使用偏少。
With the rapidly developing society which provides more various selections of the entertainment and leisure,massive public celebrities including singers,actors,artists and writers,etc.,are mushrooming during peaceful and prosperous time.Subsequently,almost motley media such as television,newspaper and magazines frequently concentrate on those celebrities's personal life.As a result of over-exposure,some people stand by the celebrities and claim that the press has paid astronomical attention into what they should not focus on with so much energy and investment.However,in my opinion,this kind of announcement is not compelling and I have specific reasons to reinforce my point. Firstly,the media are not the root of over-exposure and then they should not be blameworthy.For one thing,apparently,those celebrities-be it actors,singers or artists-must survive through enhancing their fame and making themselves familiar with the publi.Therefore,in some degree,it is the media that create the celebrities and assist them to become successful.In addition,from the perspective of psychology and biology,focusing on gossip and scandal almost is the instinct of human being which can optimize the collateral social environment,according to a recent research conducted by a biologist in Canada.In other words,it is clear that the media are just catering for the common interests. Secondly,the over-exposure sometimes can play an significant role in the sysytem of purifying the amusement industry.Obviously,the celebrities must have enoble merits and be worthywhile of eulogy,as the paradigm for the adolescents and adults.However,the authority of police can often arrest some singers who indulge in illegitimate actions.Undoubtedly,the negative performance will influence those who worship them and consider them as the pioneer of the social progress.So,if the media can focus on the celebrities' individual life,the famous must at full blast be cautionary about their quotidian affairs which will affect strongly what admires them. In conclusion,because of above two benefits,the media are not erroneous at all and the public figures should pay plenty of attention to their own deeds.Personally thinking,the media are the bonanza of the celebrities and can function as the efficient supervisor of the entertainment circle.Eventually,I hold the idea that the media are not blameworthy for their actions which can bring advantages in some ways.
