英语-日语 - 地盘 - 记录 - 日志 - 下载 - 擂台赛 - 查词 - 翻译 - 排行
  • 登录
  • 注册
  • 建议

      
  • 公告
  • 常见问题
您现在的位置:首页> 留学> 托福> 模拟题> 托福Toefl作文模拟题附范文 第52篇:草率的判断是否可信

托福Toefl作文模拟题附范文 第52篇:草率的判断是否可信

发布时间:2013-08-19 17:06浏览次数:17610
要求:

作文题目:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 

Snap judgments can never be trusted.

Use reasons and examples to support your opinion.

草率的判断不可信。你同意这种说法吗?给出原因和例子。

字数要求:300字以内。

用户的作文(系统评分82.5分
评语:

作者学术词汇使用比较准确,词汇表达较丰富,但仍需增加词汇积累;作者应增加从句的使用;语言不流畅;连词使用偏少;请注意分段;可以适当增加副词的使用。

用户练习作文:

With the context of extended producer responsibility (EPR) policy, this study adopts a governance perspective to investigate the problem of integration for supply chain decision-making factors and governance mechanisms. Based on the game theory, this paper builds the individual producer responsibility (IPR) game mode and the collective producer responsibility (IPR) game mode, and obtains optimal decisions of enterprise pollution governance technology in both modes. Results show that the optimal decision depends largely on the technological gap and degree of reliance among enterprises. Large technological gap and strong degree of reliance make CPR mode more applicable. Whereas, IPR mode is more likely to be adopt among comparable companies with weak degree of reliance. Finally, this paper summarizes the efficiency and legitimacy mechanism of dynamic equilibrium governance in the supply chain system from internal and external perspectives under the EPR policy.

会员评论0个评论)
zhaoxiukun1986
金币:2

ta的空间

ta写的其它作文
更多
ta本期其它用户练习作文
更多
得分:90.5qls763

人气:54发布:2016-07-29

得分:90.0@~@

人气:75发布:2013-09-15

得分:89.5文豪你好哈哈

人气:81发布:2014-03-04

得分:88.5jxfjc

人气:20发布:2016-06-21

得分:88.5yuki6672189

人气:95发布:2016-08-28