文章在句法方面做的很棒,从句和复杂句的使用不错;作者词汇表达较多样灵活,也能较准确地使用高级词汇;恰当的使用了过渡词和衔接词,衔接手法做的很棒。
The Olympics have are played every 4 years in many countries around the world.There has been a heated debate as to whether the Olympics should have a permanent home. Some people believed it is the best way to narrow down the financial and non financial problems. So that people should be encouraged among different countries. Also ,it is an important part of people, s cultural life and tourist sightseeing. Despite all these benefits, people should not neglect the drawback of the hidden hazards to the Olympics. This essay will argue that the Olympics should not have a permanent home for three reasons: financial problems, the function of hosting the Olympics and environment. There is no doubt that hosting the Olympic games would give country more chance to create economic benefit. To begin with, it can boost the sales of goods and stimulate consumption. Foreigners came to host the Olympics games countries which they will buy lots of things it can promote the local income. At the same time, it will create more job opportunities and these will be more money for people to have a better lifestyle. Accordingly, developing and developed countries would have an equal chance to improve their tourism income. In addition, countries are trying to display their good products in the most attractive ways, expecting to induce the consumers to buy more of the products. Such as some souvenirs which stand place characteristic products. Furthermore, the function of hosting the Olympics should not only belong to the host country and some developing country also have a chance to host the Olympics.