- 分享到:
题目要求：
Arts (painting and music) does not directly improve people's life, so government should spend money on other important areas. Do you agree or disagree?
写作思路：
第一段：引入话题，艺术是否该获得政府资金支持
第二段：社会服务当然可以明显地提高人民的生活水平，如教育，医疗，环境或基础建设。但是这些并不会增加人民的幸福感受
第三段：人民需要艺术，因为：艺术相关人们的情感和价值观，这是人们行为的核心部分；艺术培养人的创造和创新能力；艺术是娱乐休闲方式，艺术是感情和精力释放的安全方式，艺术促进不同文化和民族间的理解
第四段：政府应该既投资社会基础服务，也投资艺术。这样才能创造一个健康有生机的社会
词汇拓展：
underestimate 低估
emphasize 强调
boom = prosper繁荣
Tackle 解决
quantify 量化
empower 使人增强力量
intangible 抽象的
not necessarily 不一定
solely = only 仅仅
inspire 激励
excel 出众
make the best of 充分利用
robust 有力量的
enhance 增强
channel 引导
采用了适当的衔接手法，层次清晰；作者词汇基础扎实，拼写也很棒；作者在句法层面做的很棒。
The issue of whether arts should be subsidized by the government has sparked off an intense debate. Some people claim that financially supporting arts is conductive to the public and the entire society. Personally, I agree with this opinion. Admittedly, a series of under-developed fields which are closely linked to people's well-being such as education, public transport system and healthcare system, should be attached a heavier weight by the government. However, an array of advantages resulting from the development and prosperity of arts cannot be ignored and denied. First and foremost, this attempt exerts a positive impact on the development and advancement of social economy.It is simply because the proliferation and dissemination of indigenous artworks such as folk music and ethnic paintings, to a large extent, stimulate foreigners interests and curiosities about locally traditional culture and customs. Thereby, vernacular tourism would be largely promoted and boosted as a vast number of exotic travelers come and have a visit. Consequently, the enormous profit produced and generated by the tourism can be applied and used in the construction and improvement of fundamental infrastructure, which contributes to enhancing the societal economy and elevating living standard and equality of people.Additionally, it is undeniable that due to the globalization, traditional culture and performances cannot compete with imported popular arts and are facing extinction. The demise of conventionally cultural heritage would be an immeasurable and irreversible loss. Therefore, providing financial assistance to the area of arts fulfills a profitable function in the realm of preserving and inheriting valuable cultural treasures. To conclude, I concede that allocating a certain amount of money to arts would tighten the government's budget especially in the period of economic recession and crisis. Nevertheless, I am still convinced that the public and the entire society will become the major beneficiaries from this move, regardless of cultural protection and economic advancement.
