2014年初中毕业升学考试英语作文集锦171:中考

作者词汇基础扎实，拼写也很棒；作者在句法层面做的很棒；文章结构不错，使用了丰富的衔接词和过渡词。

‘Policy cycle’ means it makes use of a systems analysis about government has developed some policies to notification of talking about the critical stages in the policy-making process. The criticism of policy aroused a heated debate among the Althaus, Bridgam and Davis. Firstly, these people show their concern about normative (prescriptive) report and dispute this claim about how the policy process ideally operates. Secondly, it is also noteworthy that descriptive or an empirical about these ideas, especially analytical account .This is how the policy process actually does work.Thirdly, a matter of concern about it worthy distinguishing about a ‘heuristic’-analytical account this view. These are significance dimensions or elements of making decision on policy process that worthy of serious consideration and distinguishing should also comprehend how could the happen about real events. However, it makes sense to worry about the potential risks that policy cycle may bring to modern society. Firstly, some entreat policy cycle model too ‘mechanistic’ and too ‘rational’ giving rise to various problems and finding itself a difficult position.Secondly, no reasons justify this chaotic politics of policy debate and policy debate frequently changing in new and sequential phases and unpredictable ways.For example just like( ‘zig-zags’ go through the cycle) Colebatch also has some comparisons with the ‘rationality’ of the policy cycle handling the actual array of contradictory viewpoints and puts forward the values held among the diverse actors, within and outside the inner decision-making elite.The most thoroughly and completely criticized by Hank Jenkins-smith and Paul Sabatier of the policy cycle and get a summary DeLeon,s ideas about the following opinions:Firstly, the model is not a real cause and effect model-it do not do forecasting everything happen or from one stage to another. For example when the leader makes the decision to do something, the team-makers should follow the command and carry out, but sometimes is the decision is wrong or duo to team-makers slack lead to these decisions may not implement. Secondly, it does not offer the clear evidence for testing empirical hypotheses result in setting objectives and priorities are not clear. Thirdly, it is not pretty accurate to describe what happens. When policymaker determines the problem which cannot forecast what will happen in the future. How are problems perceived and defined by different actors cannot anticipate in the future.Fourthly, it has a built-in legalistic and top-down concentrate. Fifth, from the analysis of the single cycle and neglect of aspect of a system of inter-governmental relations which interacted each other. How does an initial definition of a problem affect the other problem which the relationship is the one which effects and restricts each other.Sixth, it does not recognize that policy-oriented learning is happening during the entire policy cycle. The conception of issue identification in the policy cycle does far away from policy-oriented learning. In my opinion, I agree to the criticism of the ‘stages ‘theory of the policy cycle does not take the place of the real decision ,because no one will predict what will happen in the future, especially bureaucratic mechanism and administrative. It is very hard to make accurate and feasible scheme in a one-time process which means to get the right decision for policy makers too require great research. ‘