- 分享到:
文中词汇表达灵活多样请继续保持，高级词汇积累也做的很棒；使用了部分简单的长难句，可适当增加一些复杂的长句；恰当的使用了过渡词和衔接词，衔接手法做的很棒。
By reading for the article,to start with there is an undeniable fact that deep globalization National and democracy are incompatible duo to democratic politics casts chasm shadow on financial markets and rather unlikely for a state to piece out to a large extent with the world economy.In addition,when globalization and domestic politics are incompatible especially have something to do with sovereignty.When the two collide ,an intelligent investor prefers to choose politics,deeply integrate incapable maintain itself so much even as its requirements and goals are fully internalized through nation's political leadership.Tom Friedman outlined in the article when the economy grows while politics might be result in shrink which it also explains the relationship between economy with politics.Moreover,global economy owns the basic feature with about conflict between globalization and domestic social arrangements because globalization holds up national democracy. It also mentions duo to too much trade regime ,there is no clear boundary between national sovereignty and international obligations. The relationship between democracy and globalisation in global markets is strained.The main contents are as follow:Firstly, limit democracy for the benefit of minimizing international transaction costs, overlooking the economic globalisation We can limit globalization, in the hope of building democratic legitimacy at home. Or we can globalize democracy, at the cost of national sovereignty. This gives us a menu of options for reconstructing the world economy. The menu captures the fundamental political trilemma of the world economy: we cannot have hyperglobalization, democracy, and national self-determination all at once. We can have at most two out of three. If we want hyperglobalization and democracy,
