- 分享到:
【题目要求】
Full-time university students need to spend a lot of time studying, but it is essential to involve other activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
【题目翻译】
全日制大学生需要花很多时间学习，但是也应该参加其它活动。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?
【关键词分析】
other activities
这是一个范围很广的词，包括课外活动、社交活动、义务劳动、兼职工作等。因此这道题目的展开的余地非常广。
【话题分类与题型】
本题是新题，属于教育类话题，题型为同意与否(单观点)。教育类话题是往年出现最高频的题目，上一次出现这类话题是在2012年1月14日。
【话题评价】
这道题目属于教育类话题，属于“社会实践”类分支，但是和“教育内容”这个分支也有很大的相似之处。虽然本题没有直接在雅思考试中出现过，但是类似的题目已经出现过无数次了，在G类考试中也多次出现。考生只要准备过相关的话题，就一定有话可说。
【类似话题】
1. Some people believe that some unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (e.g. working in a charity, improving the relationship of neighbourhood or teaching sports to children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
2. Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university. What are the advantages and disadvantages?
3. Some students do part-time jobs during studying. Do you think it has more advantages or disadvantages?
4. Schools should concentrate on teaching children academic subjects which are useful in their future careers. Subjects like music and sports are not important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion
【结构与思路】
本题建议采取双边支持型，同意题目中的观点。建议采取五段式，正文的前两段花主要篇幅讲课外活动及社会实践的重要性，侧重点从培养学生的能力出发。正文第三段让步，承认学习的重要性。结论是学生应该在不影响学习的前提下参加课外活动及社会实践。
作者词汇基础扎实，拼写也很棒；可适当增加复合句和从句的使用；采用了简单的衔接手法，行文流畅。
It is easy to say that China ought to shift towards renewable energy, such as solar, wind or hydroelectric power, but the problem is that diversifying energy sources is always a relative concept. Renewable energy sources draw a lot of attention in the US, but in reality, they represent only a small share of consumption. The share is even smaller in China. For example, China is a major producer of solar panels, which require a great deal of raw materials to manufacture, thus generating a considerable amount of pollution, and yet hardly uses them at all. It is a folly that China makes these panels at great environmental expense, while all the environmental benefits generated by the panels go to the countries that it exports them to. The fact is that an absolute cap on carton emissions holds the most promise for effectively easing China’s reliance on coal and reducing its carbon footprint. It is no way to achieve this, however, without the country making dramatic changes to its growth strategy. It is a politically and economically complicated task, but it can be done. First, China must stop its obsessions with GDP growth. For over twenty years now, the leadership has been relentlessly fixated on growth of around 8 percent a year. It has achieved by emphasizing the development of heavy industry, rather than investing in the service sector or light industry. It is clear that blindly encouraging industry and consumption in ways that damage the earth and degrade the air is unsustainable and unnecessary. There is some evidence that China is gradually realizing this: the government said recently that an acceptable range for growth this year is between7 and 7.5 percent. Second, China must change how it promotes political officials. Traditionally, they advance on the basis of how well they drive GDP growth. It has become the de facto measure of government achievement. However, the practice need to change. It will require China to rewrite its political playbook and judge its leader on more complex social measurements.
