"Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookville. In order to raise property values in Deerhaven Acres, we should adopt our own set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting."
题目讲解:
本题要求从题目中找出主要的逻辑错误,也就是Argument题目的提纲,同时每一个逻辑错误准备一套语言套路去反驳。
七年前,附近的Brookville社区的业主实施了一系列关于该社区的庭院应如何布置以及房屋应涂何种颜色的规定。从那以后,Brookville的地产平均价格翻了三番。为使Deerhaven Acres的地产升值,我们也应该对于景观和房屋涂色实施自己的规定。
观点提示:
1.作者没有提供证据说明产地价格升三倍一定是改变外观的结果,可能是别的措施
2.没有信息表明Deerhaven Acres和Brookville是可以比较的,未必需要restrictions。
如若增加一些长难句的使用,会为文章添彩;行文稍显不流畅,应增加文中衔接词的使用;作者词汇使用较为丰富熟练,单词拼写方面要更仔细。
According to the article, The value of the estates in Brookville have been increase after they adopted the restricitons. To increase value of Deerhaven's estates, We need to adopt the same restricions. I don't agree with this argument. There are no datas show us that the increase is because the new restricitons. It may be related to other reasons,such as economic increasing... Meanwhile, Deerhaven Acres and Brookville are two different areas. We can not get any inforamtion that these two place have the same features. So it is not fit for comparing them in a simple reason.