- 分享到:
作者词汇基本功很好，高级词汇表达也比较恰当；文中衔接词丰富；从句数量不足，可适当增加从句和复杂句的使用。
Historians in such in fact can't go wrong.But when people put forward such views, I remembered the hausmann said "accurately is a duty, not virtue".Praise a historian of accurate historical data, like praise for architects, building the house of wood drying, concrete mix well.Accurate is a necessary condition for his work, but not his basic functions.It is in these matters, historians can rely on archaeology, epigraphy, numismatics, chronology, etc. These are known as "secondary science" history subject.I want to say the second point is that whether need to make sure these basic does not depend on the fact that the fact itself, but on historians make the judgment in advance.Although c. p. Scott's motto is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people (translator note: proverbs Scott's Comment is free, but facts are which. "the facts do not distort, review can freedom"), but now know every a journalist to influence public opinion, the most effective way is to select a specific facts and splicing.People used to say the facts speak for themselves.This statement is clearly wrong, historical facts only in the history of household then will speak for themselves.What facts can be, and in what order these facts or appear in what kind of situation, is determined by historians.But historians are unlikely to pay attention to you arrived in this building it.Tal Kurt professor parsons, once called the science "to the real cognitive orientation of a selective system".It may use more simple words to express.But history is an important characteristic is its selectivity.The historian must choose historical facts.Some believe that history is real, is objective, not around for the history of interpretation.This view is very absurd, but it is difficult to eradicate.But a year ago, Mr. Kitson Dr Clark on the ford of the university of Oxford lecture series mentioned this matter.So it becomes the historical facts?I don't want to.I think, in this have strict rules on admission criteria in the history of the club, this event is now equivalent to the status of the candidate member.It is now waiting seconder and guarantor.Maybe in the next few years, we will see the fact that first appeared in the 19th century British footnotes of articles and books, and then may appear in the text.In two hundred and thirty, it is probably a certain historical facts.Another possibility, that is never mentioned it.So that it will again be drowned in those of historical facts about the past in the heap that were forgotten, and Mr. Kitson Dr Clark to save its heroic efforts would be wasted.These two possibilities which will happen?Depends on what?I think it depends on whether other historians think Mr. Kitson clark, Ph.D., refer to the event to prove valid argument or interpretation, and is of great significance.This event as a historical position depends on the interpretation of historians.And contain any historical interpretation.
