语句间的衔接成分用得不错,同时文章中的过程性词汇很丰富;作者词汇基础扎实,拼写也很棒;作者句法知识掌握的不够好,可适当增加从句的使用。
If Karl Marx was still alive in the world, chances are that he would frown upon the widening disparity between the well-paid senior staff, who are in charge of lifeblood of the company and other workers who are heavily exploited for their surplus value. In spite of the harshness in the distribution of payment, I am in favor of the view that the salary should be in line with the hierarchy of staff their companies. The staff who are in the relatively high level in companies assume more accountability of the operation of companies, which justifies the status quo that they are supposed to be better rewarded. The senior members' responsibilities do not only confine in the office trifles such as printing the files for the meeting, or work out a balance sheet for the financial quarter. Instead, they are under the massive pressure to be insightful policy makers who are seemingly at ease with daunting tasks, because one of their minor mistakes is likely to trigger a blunder, bringing inevitable financial loss to their companies. On the other hand, the high salary of the senior staff can also serve as incentive to their subordinates. Monetary reward, materialistic as it might be, can stir more motivation of staff because it is a conspicuous fact that a decent salary is the foundation of the daily life. With the seductive payback, workers are more willing to fullill their duties with higher quality and the talent of the able would be fully tapped to the benefit for companies and themselves. Of course, the dark sides cannot be neglected due to its advantages the high salary brings. Certain senior members share the lion's share of benefit and the rest of it is then allocated to majority of junior employees. This income gap is a dormant factor that can damage the rapport of the members and undermine the overall moral and collaboration of different levels of staff. In conclusion, the principle of "no pain no gain'' still works as a maxim in the modem companies. Egalitarianism is only a utopian depiction, while utilitarianism has the final say.