作文题目:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Snap judgments can never be trusted.
Use reasons and examples to support your opinion.
草率的判断不可信。你同意这种说法吗?给出原因和例子。
字数要求:300字以内。
The reading passage is talking about the origin of the Voynich manuscript. The author provide three theories about it. such as Anthony Ascham, Edward Kelley or Wilfrid M. Voynich. The professor figure out all of the flaws in those theories. First off, Anthony Ascham was the author of this manuscript while the man did believe the idea. Voynich was just a normal physician and botanist and the context of book of Anthony is as same as normal. The herbal, for instance, the professor mentioned in the listening passage could be easily find everywhere. Bonus, some theories point out the possibility of making by Edward Kelley. However, the professor stress it was not neccesssary for him to make such complex. According to the fact that people lived in ancient was very simple. Therefore, there was not any neccessary for him to sacrifice so much. Addtionally, the professor contend that the Voynich was not the author either. because of the ink in the manuscript had been proved over 400 years, Voynich was not likely to get such long period of time of ink to fake.