题目要求:
围绕沟通的意义写一篇小文章。简明阐述自己的观点。
字数要求:
200字以内
作者学术词汇使用比较准确,词汇表达较丰富,但仍需增加词汇积累;丰富从句的使用,文章会更出色;文中衔接词丰富;请注意分段;可以适当增加副词的使用。
Under the DSU Article 11, which designed the function of panels that “…According, a panel should make an objective assessment of the matter before it, including an objective assessment of the facts of the case and applicability of and conformity with the relevant covered agreement”[ DSU Article 11.], the Panel can and must consider the totality of the facts relating to the measure that is the subject of this dispute. In the view that Commercia has not and cannot take issue with the facts as a whole, the parties discuss this issue in purely trade terms within the GATS based on the facts stated by Commercia, will be divorced from the broader context of the dispute. Taking the issue with the facts as a whole, there is much evidence prove that the measure at issue is inseparable from the non-WTO claims. Actually, in the initial stage of the dispute, all the material aspects show that it is a dispute of investment between the foreign company (Avanti Ltd)and the host country (Aquitania). As a consequence of disputes arisen on concession contract, which involved in the fulfillment of the “universal service obligation” and Auitania’s human right obligation, Avanti Ltd approached the Trade Ministry of Commercia to lodge a compliant against Aquitania. Then, the Trade Ministry of Commercia initiated the dispute settlement mechanism under the OFTA before requested the establishment of the WTO panel.